Re: [802.3_NGAUTO] OAM

[Saied Benyamin <Saied.Benyamin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks William. This is exactly what was proposed by Jim and I.

-saied

 

From: William Lo <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 1:23 PM
To: Saied Benyamin <Saied.Benyamin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-3-NGAUTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: OAM

 

Hi Saied,

 

I’m saying we don’t use the RS(360, 326) during LPI. 

The RS(16, 14) is used all the time (normal and LPI refresh).

It enables the option such as the one you and Jim are proposing.

 

Thanks,

William

 

 

 

From: Saied Benyamin <Saied.Benyamin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 16:48
To: STDS-802-3-NGAUTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_NGAUTO] OAM

 

Hi William,

              Thank you for your proposal on the OAM (http://www.ieee802.org/3/ch/public/nov18/Lo_3ch_01a_1118.pdf) for the plenary meeting.  On slide 2 for design goals you list the following

 

• Give option to protect OAM frame without full RS during LPI

 

Perhaps I am still jet-lagged, but can you clarify if with this you are referring to what Jim and I proposed at the adhoc in this presentation

http://www.ieee802.org/3/ch/public/adhoc/802.3ch_OAM_Graba_Benyamin_draft_29Oct18.pdf

where the outer RS1024(360,326) is removed during LPI or are you proposing to remove the inner OAM RS?

 

Thanks

-saied

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGAUTO list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGAUTO&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGAUTO list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGAUTO&A=1