Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Claudio, Since the deck does not speak to it … why would you want two solutions to the same problem? It seems odd at best to have two different PCS designs for the very same job Marek From: Claudio DeSanti <00000b528d17fa95-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxx> Dear Colleagues, at today's P802.3cs call, this PCS proposal was reviewed: http://www.ieee802.org/3/cs/public/AdHoc/20190822-Super-PON_PCS_Proposal.pdf No objections were raised by the people participating to the call, however it was recommended to have other task force participants to review it for further discussion at the next meeting. Thank you, Claudio. To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-SUPER-PON list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-SUPER-PON&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-SUPER-PON list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-SUPER-PON&A=1 |