Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements [really Oregon Trail Etherloop?]

To: Frank Miller <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements [really Oregon Trail Etherloop?]
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:42:40 -0400
cc: "'Vladimir Oksman'" <oksman@broadcom.com>, "'Hugh Barrass'" <hbarrass@cisco.com>, "Lough, Andy" <andy_lough@mitel.com>, Sherman Ackley <SAckley@nrtc.org>, "Stds-802-3-Efm (E-mail)" <stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:18:08 PDT." <AB5E88345404DE49B49723CCB93580F0261EEC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "'Vladimir Oksman'" <oksman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Frank Miller <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-stds-802-3-efm@majordomo.ieee.org



My burning question for you all at Oregon Trail is: how has your work
with Etherloop gone and why is it that Etherloop is not just the
standard for copper 10/100mb/sec EFM?  It has been around for a while,
does it really work as specified?

If does have problems, it would be nice to get the problems into the
public knowledge base so that the standard could avoid them. 

thanks,
fletcher

References:
- RE: [EFM] EFM Requirements
  - From: Frank Miller

Prev by Date: Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Next by Date: RE: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Prev by thread: Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Next by thread: RE: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread