RE: [EFM] OAM loop back / echo server function
As it is the case with cable modems today, the problem with this setup
is that it houses the IP stack on a management VLAN which is not exposed
through a third party access POI. I think that Link beats updates
should propagate at layer 2 across a third party access POI. Hence why
I am favouring at this time something that is in-band, rather than out
of band.
-=Francois=-
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-efm@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-3-efm@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Geoff
Thompson
Sent: September 4, 2001 6:03 PM
To: fkittred@xxxxxxx
Cc: stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org
Subject: Re: [EFM] OAM loop back / echo server function
Fletcher-
I don't think this is a stupid question.
I don't think we need an IP level PING
A L2 ping would do, perhaps even better, the demarc would look for PING
type and then just swap SA & DA.
My expectation is that the demarcation device will need a MAC address My
expectation is that the demarcation device will probably end up with an
IP address in order to support:
SNMP for OA&M
Firewall services for the subscriber
(That issue is, of course, beyond our scope)
Geoff
At 03:47 PM 9/4/01 -0400, Fletcher E Kittredge wrote:
>On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:11:54 -0700 "Geoff Thompson" wrote:
> > As I have said before, I do believe that we will need a demarcation
> > device that has the capability to host OA&M functions. We have
> > talked about "loop back" from this point in the network. Let us
> > forevermore make that "PING"
>
>Geoff;
>
> Apologies if this is a stupid question, but does PING in this
>context mean the utility that sends an IP ICMP ECHO REQUEST packet and
>listens for an ECHO REPLY packet? If so, am I correct in thinking this
>means the demarcation device would require an IP address?
>
>thanks!
>fletcher