Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

RE: [EFM] OAM loop back / echo server function

To: Tony Jeffree <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [EFM] OAM loop back / echo server function
From: "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 09:06:41 -0700
Cc: stds-802-3-efm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010906105829.01632ef8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4.2.0.58.20010906010426.00a35500@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20010906081625.027e6be8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-stds-802-3-efm@majordomo.ieee.org


Of course. (forgive me it was late)

At 10:59 AM 9/6/01 +0100, Tony Jeffree wrote:

>Geoff -
>
>I think you meant to say mandating 802.2....
>
>Regards,
>Tony
>
>At 01:07 06/09/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>
>>David-
>>
>>Mandating 802.3 doesn't make any more sense than mandating which 
>>protocols would be supported under the EtherType. The customer gets to 
>>decide which protocols he will make use of and which he will discard as 
>>gibberish.
>>
>>Geoff
>>

References:
- RE: [EFM] OAM loop back / echo server function
  - From: Geoff Thompson
- RE: [EFM] OAM loop back / echo server function
  - From: Tony Jeffree
- RE: [EFM] OAM loop back / echo server function
  - From: Tony Jeffree

Prev by Date: RE: [EFM] Discovery (it was OAM...)
Next by Date: Re: [EFM] OAM loop back / echo server function
Prev by thread: RE: [EFM] OAM loop back / echo server function
Next by thread: RE: [EFM] OAM loop back / echo server function, ping.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread