Re: [EFM] OAM - Faye's seven points
At 20:16 20/09/2001 -0400, Matt Squire wrote:
>Both OAM and data traffic travel over the same medium. No matter how we
>slice it, OAM traffic does reduce the bandwidth available to the user.
Absolutely. Unless you are talking about OAM being carried on a separate
physical medium, arguments about side band vs frame based solutions seem to
me to be somewhat spurious. The real issue here is whether the OAM traffic
is bandwidth-limited or not.
>One way to cap that effect is to use a dedicated side-band with a
>limited bandwidth. An alternate way to cap the effect is to
>police/shape the OAM traffic at a layer above. A third alternative is
>to use something like a slow protocol which is limited to 5 frames/sec.
Isn't option 3 just a specific example of option 2?
Regards,
Tony
>Roy Bynum wrote:
> >
> > Harry,
> >
> > I think that Faye is correct. If the OAM is "frame" based, then it will
> > share the same bandwidth with the customer traffic. Only if the OAM is
> > "side band" will it not share the same bandwidth as the customer traffic.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Roy Bynum
> >
> > At 02:31 PM 9/20/01 -0700, Harry Hvostov wrote:
> >
> > >Faye,
> > >
> > >What I meant was that the OAM control frames would not be forwarded
> outside
> > >the ePON network.
> > >
> > >Harry