RE: [EFM] RE: [EFM-Copper] the merits of 12 kft and +

[Frank Miller <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Daun,

POTs allows for 'single line service', which renders DSL provisioning more
palatable to residential customers that do not desire a dedicated line for
DSL services.

Take care,

Frank

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daun Langston [mailto:daun@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:51 AM
> To: Behrooz Rezvani; 'Frank Miller'; 'Vladimir Oksman'
> Cc: 'Copper'; stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org; 'Hugh Barrass'; 
> 'Howard Frazier';
> Frank Van der Putten
> Subject: RE: [EFM] RE: [EFM-Copper] the merits of 12 kft and +
> 
> 
> 
> How do folks want to handle POTs in this case?  Do we want to 
> make POTS
> support not required, therefore no inline filters required, 
> as the norm.
> 
> I see no issues with this requirements list as it is now 
> forming.  I also
> know of a design where this is not a theoretical exercise.
> 
> I would support a submission advocating such if POTs support was not
> mandatory.  I want to get rid of mandatory POTs support to reduce
> truck-rolls, therefore cost.  I have no objection to optional 
> POTS support.
> 
> Daun
> Metanoia +1 530-639-0311 (v)
>