RE: [EFM] RE: [EFM-Copper] the merits of 12 kft and +
- To: "'O'Mahony, Barry'" <barry.omahony@xxxxxxxxx>, <cribeiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,       "'Stanley, Patrick'" <pstanley@xxxxxxxxxxx>,       "'Jack Andresen'" <jandresen@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Subject: RE: [EFM] RE: [EFM-Copper] the merits of 12 kft and +
 
- From: "Ron McConnell" <rcmcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:50:37 -0500
 
- Cc: <daun@nccn.net>, "'Behrooz Rezvani'" <behrooz@ikanos.com>,       "'Frank Miller'" <frank@oregontrail.net>,       "'Vladimir Oksman'" <oksman@broadcom.com>,       "'Copper'" <stds-802-3-efm-copper@ieee.org>, <stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org>,       "'Hugh Barrass'" <hbarrass@cisco.com>,       "'Howard Frazier'" <millardo@dominetsystems.com>,       "'Frank Van der Putten'" <frank.van_der_putten@alcatel.be>,       "John W2XS Meade" <jmeade@telebytebroadband.com>
 
- Importance: Normal
 
- In-Reply-To: <86DB568235A8D511ABAC0002A5072CA5CA0622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Sender: owner-stds-802-3-efm@majordomo.ieee.org
 
Carlos Ribeiro, CTBC Telecom, says
about telephone/ISDN operation during customer
power failure,
"...ISDN, but not in all countries; 
I believe that the US standard has not
remote power, ..."
Remote powering the ISDN DSL NT via the loop
was being considered in the US in the mid-1980s.  
I did some back of the envelope
calculations (easily verified) that showed
that if ISDN were as successful as everyone
expected/hoped/dreamed, the CO battery plant capacity
would have to be doubled to handle the 24 hour,
7 day, 365 day/year power requirements.
I showed the numbers to the Bellcore power folks 
and RBOC reps to T1D1.3 (T1E1.4 predecessor)
in the little Bellcore ISDN newsletter.
Full time remote network powering got dropped in a hurry.
Hooks for network powering through the interface
and for customer or network provided battery backup
were included for the cases in which
it was really necessary.
I wonder what the Germans' experience with
battery capacity was/is.
Cheers,
Ron McConnell
rmcconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx