Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [EFM] [EFM-P2MP] 10G EPONs

Title: RE: [EFM] [EFM-P2MP] 10G EPONs
Of course not  - my bad.  I really meant "less than 500 bananas".
 
V.
-----Original Message-----
From: FEffenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:FEffenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:32 AM
To: vincent.bemmel@xxxxxxxxxxxx; david@broadlight.com
Cc: stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org; stds-802-3-efm-p2mp@ieee.org
Subject: RE: [EFM] [EFM-P2MP] 10G EPONs

Vincent,
No dollar figures, please!!
 
Fe.
-----Original Message-----
From: vincent.bemmel@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vincent.bemmel@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:53 PM
To: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org; stds-802-3-efm-p2mp@ieee.org
Subject: RE: [EFM] [EFM-P2MP] 10G EPONs

David,
 
I'd like to add that the cost of an entire ONU should be in the sub-$500 range by late next year.   
 
If you add the cost of the electronics and processing required to terminate a 2.5 Gbps data stream, I seriously doubt this is achievable.
 
Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: David Levi [mailto:david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:58 PM
To: carlosal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gerry.pesavento@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bob.barrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org; stds-802-3-efm-p2mp@ieee.org; vincent.bemmel@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [EFM] [EFM-P2MP] 10G EPONs

 Carlos,

As Vincent mentions the most important thing here is cost. 

 

  • The main ONU costs today lies on the optic, where rates above 622Mbps upstream requires expensive lasers in order to maintain the required distance and split. Moving to 2.5 Gbps upstream will result in very expensive transceiver.