| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Bob,
The flag tables are defined as follow:
Register_Req
0 - Reserved
1 - Register
2 - Reserved
3 - Deregister
Register
0 - reserved
1 - Reregister
2 - Deregister
3 - Ack
4 - Nack
Register_Ack
0 - Nack
1 - Ack
I don't see the need to define these fields differently for each message when the Register flag definition could cover both the Register_Req and Register_Ack.
I think this is closely related to your presentation. If we are going to make these messages look alike, then let's make sure all the fields do too.
I filed comments on these issues, and thus support your presentation. Sorry I can't be there to vote.
Regards,
Ryan Hirth
-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Gaglianello [mailto:bgf@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 2:49 PM
To: stds-802-3-efm-p2mp@ieee.org
Subject: [EFM-P2MP] MPCP Frame Format Slides For Closing EFM session
P2MPers,
This is Bob Gaglianello. I am using my wife's email becasue I have not
been able to dial out of the Hotel since last night and access my email
account.
Attached is a presentation for "harmonizing" the MPCP Frame Formats.
They will be presented at today's EFM closing session. Please feel free
to comment.
thanks,
bobg