| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear all,
I was in the IIR WDM and NG Optical Newtworking conference
last week and many speakers and participants expressed their views for the
urgent need of 400G/1T interface.
I like to support the initiating of this activity of
"high speed interface greater than 100G" asap and within 802.3. Perhaps we can
start by working initially for a CFI on this topic.
Regards,
Ghani
From: Peter Stassar [mailto:Peter.Stassar@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 26 June 2012 15:14 To: STDS-802-3-DIALOG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [802.3_DIALOG] New 'Higher Speed Ethernet Consensus' Industry Connections activity Hi all, I would like to express my full support for this IC activity
in line with previous support messages from Pete Anslow and Mark
Nowell. Kind regards, Peter Peter Stassar Technical Director Huawei Technologies Ltd European Research Center Karspeldreef 4, 1101CJ Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 4300 832 Mob: +31 6 21146286 -------------------------------------------------------- To:
STDS-802-3-DIALOG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [802.3_DIALOG] New 'Higher
Speed Ethernet Consensus' Industry Connections activity From: "Mark Nowell (mnowell)"
<mnowell@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:21:54
-0400 Delivered-to:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In-reply-to:
<29C931202891DE4ABE913168E7AC43ECA85091FE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> List-help:
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-3-DIALOG>,
<mailto:LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?body=INFO%20STDS-802-3-DIALOG> List-owner:
<mailto:STDS-802-3-DIALOG-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> List-subscribe:
<mailto:STDS-802-3-DIALOG-subscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> List-unsubscribe:
<mailto:STDS-802-3-DIALOG-unsubscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> References:
<256C0B6368B8E84AA888EF260D95C8654E9F6527@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<29C931202891DE4ABE913168E7AC43ECA85091FE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-to: "Mark Nowell (mnowell)"
<mnowell@xxxxxxxxx> Thread-index:
Ac1TnqhgjNH4w5wTSnu93iai8wcVrg== Thread-topic: [802.3_DIALOG] New 'Higher
Speed Ethernet Consensus' Industry Connections activity I agree with Pete. We have been seeing growing interest from
numerous network operators covering SP, MSO and Data Center spaces, to have
clarity on when a next higher speed of Ethernet would be available.
Concern is that it will be available in time for their projected network
needs. The sustained network bandwidth growth, driven largely by the
increase in users and the increase in user consumption (such as video) is
challenging network's ability to scale. Built into this need for a speed
step is also the challenge of ensuring a cost effective solution.
At the last interim meeting a number of interested people got
together for an ad-hoc discussion around this topic. At the close we took
a straw poll to gauge interest in starting things moving towards a next HSSG
project. Results indicated that there was strong interest in kicking this off.
In light of this, I support the On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:01 AM, "Anslow, Peter"
<panslow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > John, > > Thanks for initiating this new 'Higher Speed Ethernet'
Industry Connections activity. > > I have seen a tremendous amount of interest in higher
rates of Ethernet at conferences and workshops since 802.3ba was completed, so I
think that it is a good idea to start an activity within 802.3 aimed at
gathering consensus on a way forward towards a future CFI on this
topic. > > Regards, > Pete Anslow | Senior Standards Advisor > 43-51 Worship Street | London, EC2A 2DX,
UK > Direct +44 2070 125535 | > > >
_____________________________________________ > From: Law, David [mailto:dlaw@xxxxxx] > Sent: 22 June 2012 08:44 > To: STDS-802-3-DIALOG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [802.3_DIALOG] New 'Higher Speed Ethernet
Consensus' Industry Connections activity > > > Dear Colleagues, > > I have received a request from John D'Ambrosia to
forward the following message to the IEEE 802.3 Working Group reflector. As the
IEEE 802.3 Working Group reflector is for announcements only I have also CCed
the IEEE 802.3 general discussion reflector. Please therefore direct all
discussions to the IEEE 802.3 general discussion reflector
<stds-802-3-dilaog@xxxxxxxx> > > The IEEE 802.3 general discussion reflector is an opt-in
reflector so if you wish to discuss this issue please subscribe to the IEEE
802.3 general discussion reflector, if you have not already done so, at the URL
<http://www.ieee802.org/3/dialog_reflector.html>, or follow the discussion
on the reflector email archive at the URL
<http://www.ieee802.org/3/email_dialog/thrd1.html>. > > Best regards, > David > > ------ > > Dear Members of the IEEE 802.3 Working
Group, > > Per the July Plenary Meeting Announcement, the Ethernet
Bandwidth Assessment Ad Hoc will be seeking Working Group approval of its
report. In addition, I will be working with Pete Anslow, Mark Nowell, Scott
Kipp, and Peter Stassar to put on a tutorial at the July Plenary <See
http://www.ieee802.org/802_tutorials/2012-07/802-0712-TutorialFlyer-V1.pdf>.
> > At the IEEE 802.3 May Interim I spoke at most of the
Task Force and Study Group meetings (all but MIBs and Maintenance) regarding the
future after the IEEE 802.3 BWA. I have been working with a group of
approximately 60 individuals on a new 'Higher Speed Ethernet' Industry
Connections activity. The proposed scope of the activity would be to focus
on building consensus related to the next speed of Ethernet for wireline
applications, which will be used for the evaluation and possible development of
a Call-For-Interest for the next Higher Speed Study Group. Please note that
unlike the prior BWA activity, the output of this effort would be the historical
records, i.e. meeting notes & presentations, of the meetings held by this
Industry Connections activity. > > In the interest of full disclosure, an Industry
Connections activity Initiation Document (ICAID) was submitted to the Industry
Connections Committee (ICCom) for conditional approval, conditional on IEEE 802
EC endorsement in July, at its June 8th meeting. However, ICCom postponed
recommending it approval until it has been endorsed by IEEE 802 EC (the
sponsoring group), and it was indicated that ICCom will schedule a
teleconference the Monday after the plenary, which could then be submitted for a
10 day standards board email ballot. > > Unfortunately, this will have an impact on the formative
activities related to the anticipated first meeting of this new IC Activity, as
well as the accompanying workshop, where the BWA findings and next steps can be
discussed. > > The other option, which I have chosen to pursue, is to
forward my request to the IEEE 802 EC for endorsement prior to the July Plenary.
This will enable ICCom's approval recommendation sooner, as well as the final
approval of the Standards Board. > > I had already requested time at the July opening agenda
to give the IEEE 802.3 WG an update, but given the timing of things, wanted to
send this email out, so that the members of the WG were aware of the status of
my activities. > > Please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions. > > Regards, > John D'Ambrosia > |