Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Steve: Upon receiving David's anouncement of the P802.3cx preview, I took another look at your draft. I noted you might have a problem if not fixed before the September 802.3 WG interim. From the 802.3 WG Ops Man: 2.6.2 Draft Standard Balloting Requirements Before a draft is submitted to WG letter ballot it shall in addition have met the following requirements:
1. I searched on TBD and got 5 hits. Please add an abstract and keywords (even though these arguably are not open technical issues), and look at your clause 1 TBDs and either provide content, or remove the subclauses if you have determined that there are not new normative references, definitions or acronyms. 2. Though not a technical completeness issue, why is so much of your clause 30 content just a copy of existing text (pages 19 to 28)? A cursory scan turned up no changes, and I assume the absence of editing instructions means there is no change on those pages. 3. The editorial note on page 28 is an indication that the draft is not technically complete as required by 802.3 rules. 4. Arguable if technical completeness, but there is no editorial instruction to insert Annex 90A. 5. Not technical completeness (and I personally like an editor pointing at where they want additional thought), but the editorial note on page 73 might stimulate argument about technical completeness, though it indicates the possible figures would be additional explanatory content rather than providing missing technical specifications. 6. Similar to #5, the editorial note on page 79 might generate discussion. — Bob Grow To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-DIALOG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-DIALOG&A=1 |