| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | 
| 
 Mark, Comments below. Hesham From: Mark Laubach [mailto:laubach@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
 Hi John, And for others that have joined the EPoC Study Group email discussion list.  Welcome! 
 There are a number of things that are in the Call for Interest (CFI) presentation as guidance items.  The CFI is available at:   
http://www.ieee802.org/3/epoc/public/nov11/index.html My initial answers. Note: The SG contribution and consensus process will have more on these as its official answers: 1) Open for SG discussion, flexible with cable operator initial deployment and changes.  As an SG effort, we’ll probably need to evaluate from 5MHz to 2.8GHz
 (there are taps in the market that run up 2.8GHz….) 2) and 3) strong preference for “as is” but cable operator requirements followed by SG work to see how it plays out 4) open for discussion, but there is the strong notion of being able to work “around” existing services without disruption
 5) EPoC is a new service that should be compatible with existing services and “on the wire” signaling.  While specific signaling mathematics will be a topic
 for the Task Force, the SG will likely have some guidance/objectives at conclusion going into the TF. HEB> If EPoC is a service then it is more than just a PHY and therefore, as Matt mentioned we need to study the interactions between  the PHY and different
 components of EPoC system to achieve the intended service and performance. HEB> I am assuming that by “signaling on the wire” you mean  the modulation used by the PHY (e.g. OFDM, wavelet OFDM, QAM, …. Etc). In this respect, by compatibility
 with existing services do you mean that EPoC  as a service needs to support new PHY and existing PHYs ? i.e. Does CMC need to find out if at the other end of the wire it is connected to CNU, CM, or say
 HomePlugAV CPE and then uses the appropriate PHY modulation and appropriate MAC ? Mark From: John Santhoff [mailto:jsanthoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
 I'm new to this group so please forgive me if these questions have already been answered. If so where can I find the document? 1) What are the frequencies to be used for Downstream and Upstream? 2) Is the goal to use the existing infrastructure "As-Is" or do we have the option to upgrade equipment? 3) Is the goal to maintain existing amplifier spacing? 4) Is the plan to maintain the 6/8 MHz channel spacing? 5) What about legacy signaling? Is that being maintained? -John   On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Hesham ElBakoury <Hesham.ElBakoury@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Howard,   I have few questions regarding the Operator requirements (pertaining to physical layer):      Service coexistence issues and criteria    Services to be provided over EPoC HEB> Do you mean residential and business services or video, IPTV, VoIP, data services ?       and how they will evolve over time       Business vs residential services              (will they exist on the same network?)       Asymmetry vs. symmetry    Existing cable plant characteristics       Architectures              (Node+0 "passive", Node+N [N=1-?],  Complete HFC, MxU)
       Amplifier characteristics and considerations that will effect the PHY       Cable & passives characteristics       Typical size of cable plant HEB> I am not sure how you measure the size ? (number of home passed, size of coverage area, number of nodes, … etc).       Subscribers passed       Number and size of taps    Changes to cable plant characteristics over time        (e.g. passive and active element changes, any use of bypasses?)    Spectral allocation       and how it changes over time       Which frequencies are amplified and which are passive    `  What spectrum will be allocated for EPoC initially,
             and how will that change over time                 Regional differences for changes?    Functional Assumptions and Impairments       DOCSIS 3.0 has already characterized in CM-SP-PHYv3.0-I05-070803, Chapter 5,                   and in CM-SP-DRFI-I12-111117, Chapter 5, for "in amplified" regions of
                   cable. For both "in amplified" and "passive" EPoC considerations, are
                   there any additonal functional assumptions and impairments that need to
                   be considered for up to 1Gbps and higher operation? 
                 How will these change over time?                 Are there regional differences; e.g. China, Europe?    Number of subscribers per network, take rate    Minimum required channel data rate    Maximum desired channel data rate   Thanks   Hesham   -----Original Message-----   The first meeting of the IEEE 802.3 EPON Protocol over Coax (EPoC) PHY Study Group will be held January 24th and 25th in Newport Beach, CA, hosted by the Ethernet Alliance. Please see my previous message for links to meeting logistical details.   In preparation for the meeting, Mark Laubach and I put together a list of topics that can help us prepare for a successful study group meeting, and these are listed in the attached file.   The first set of topics deals with the IEEE 802 standards development process. I have all of the material I need for this section, and I am sure that I will be able to enlist the help of some of our experienced hands to deliver it.   The second set of topics deals with operator requirements, and this is where I would like to make an appeal for contributions. We may not get contributions that address all of the topics listed, and there may not even be universal agreement that the topics
 are relevant, but I think that these are areas that must be explored in the study group if we are to do a proper job of defining the scope of a new project, and judging it against the "5 Criteria".   People wishing to make a contribution to the study group should review the "Procedure for Presenters" information that can be found here:   http://www.ieee802.org/3/epoc/public/presentproc.html   Since this is a new email reflector, I would also like to make people aware of the IEEE 802.3 Working Group email reflector policy that can be found here:   http://www.ieee802.org/3/reflector_policy.html   I will welcome your comments and questions.   Howard Frazier Broadcom Corporation   ________________________________________________________________________   To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1 <="" p="">  
  |