Re: [802.3_EPOC] FW: Rejected posting to STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Geoff,
Thanks! We can do that.
Let me ask two questions to be sure I understood:
1. Is this suppose to be a facility provided by IEEE, such as the site
where materials for the plenary and interim meetings are posted?
2.a. If the answer to the above is YES, how would we post to that site? I
think so far only the chair is able to post materials in that site?
2.b. If the answer to the above is NO, would it be OK if we created a site
elsewhere else and provided the URL for that site?
Thanks!
Jorge
-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Thompson <thompson@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Geoff Thompson <thompson@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, July 30, 2012 12:32 PM
To: "Salinger, Jorge" <Jorge_Salinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: EPoC Study Group <STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [802.3_EPOC] FW: Rejected posting to
STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Jorge-
>The preferred method is to put an upload mechanism in place and then
>announce its availability and URL.
>Geoff
>
>On 307//12 8:54 AM, Salinger, Jorge wrote:
>> Steve,
>> David,
>> Paul,
>>
>> The EPoC Study Group reflector seems to be limited to distributing
>> attachments that don't exceed 500KB. See below a sample rejection notice
>> from the reflector when I tried to send a PDF of a set of slides we were
>> reviewing at a meeting. FYI, I tried to send the PPT first and that
>> bounced for the same reason, so I tried to send the PDF which also
>>bounced
>> even though it was much smaller.
>>
>> I don't know if this is a rule that applies to all 802.3 projects, or
>>only
>> applies to Study Groups, but it at least seems to apply to the EPoC
>>Study
>> Group.
>>
>> Could you let us know if this restriction will not be an issue for the
>> EPoC TF moving forward, or if all projects have this attachment size
>> restriction? If the later, could this restriction be lifted so we can
>> distribute larger attachments?
>>
>> Naturally we think that this restriction is overly constraining,
>> especially given the nature and size of attachments of common use
>> nowadays. Perhaps there is a good reason for doing that, in which case
>>we
>> will have to find a workaround (although maybe IEEE promotes a supported
>> workaround).
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "IEEE LISTSERV Server (16.0)"<LISTSERV@xxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Monday, July 30, 2012 11:25 AM
>> To: "Salinger, Jorge"<Jorge_Salinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Rejected posting to STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>> Your message cannot be distributed to the STDS-802-3-EPOC list
>>> because it
>>> exceeds the maximum message size of 500k. The size of your
>>> message was
>>> 1,200,152 bytes.
>>>
>>> This limit has been set by the list owner and does not necessarily
>>>apply
>>> to the
>>> other lists hosted at LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG. If you have any
>>>questions,
>>> please
>>> contact the list owner at STDS-802-3-EPOC-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1
>>
>>
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1