Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-3-EPOC] EPoC Evaluation Criteria and Requirements Ad Hoc

Thanks Steve,
I like to confirm, also on behalf of Marek, that we are able to present an overview of the DRA function next Wednesday - we prepared a short slide deck (attached) and are happy to share it already now.
This is mainly serving the purpose to illustrate the need for DRA and also to show how it is done in EPON and how we could adopt same principles in EPoC. Early comments are of course welcome.

Thanks,
Andrea

From: Shellhammer, Steve [mailto:sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 19:03
To: STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-EPOC] EPoC Evaluation Criteria and Requirements Ad Hoc

Marek,

               Sure, that would be fine.  Please tell me by next Tuesday if you would like to present next Wednesday, and I can put you on the agenda.

               I agree that adding more Ad Hocs is not a good idea unless it is something that is going to go on for a while.  If we can fit it into this Ad Hoc I am fine with that.

Steve

From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 12:19 AM
To: Shellhammer, Steve; STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Laubach
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-3-EPOC] EPoC Evaluation Criteria and Requirements Ad Hoc

Steve,

Sorry for picking on you, but I'd like to ask the question about presenting general-purpose materials.

It has been pointed out that the Data Rate Adaptation (DRA) material was not disseminated sufficiently prior to the meeting, and I'd like to  know whether introduction material for this mechanism fits into the scope of this ad-hoc. Same goes for power-saving - I have an introduction presentation I'd like to share prior to March meeting and have it discussed on the phone. Does this fit into the scope of your ad-hoc?

It would seem odd to me to have other new ad-hocs formed for these topics, especially when they contain very focused material and do not need (I believe) long technical consideration. However, I also see the need to have calls devoted to dissemination and socialization of proposals, where people could bring in material they plan to have discussed at the next meeting and form consensus. Email is not always the best medium here, especially when slides need additional discussion and revision.

Thanks

Marek

From: Shellhammer, Steve [mailto:sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 January, 2013 1:13 AM
To: STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [STDS-802-3-EPOC] EPoC Evaluation Criteria and Requirements Ad Hoc

All,

               This is a reminder that we have an Evaluation Criteria and Requirements Ad Hoc call Wednesday at 7 AM Pacific Time (10 AM Eastern Time).

               The bridge information is in the appointment that I sent out previously.

               If anyone has a presentation for this meeting please notify me.

               In my personal opinion we should try to close out this Ad Hoc by March.  We have discussed a number of potential evaluation criteria and requirement but have only selected a few.  I would like to see how we can nail down the ones we really agree to by March.  Let's discuss tomorrow.

Agenda

*         Review IEEE-SA Patent Policy

o   https://development.standards.ieee.org/myproject/Public/mytools/mob/slideset.pdf

*         Attendance

*         Discuss Open Issues List

*         Other

Steve


________________________________

________________________________

<="" p="">

________________________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1

Attachment: Data_Rate_Adaptation_function_Overview_31Jan2013.pptx
Description: Data_Rate_Adaptation_function_Overview_31Jan2013.pptx