Re: [STDS-802-3-EPOC] Minutes
Duane,
I believe you'd agree that creating a set of a few thousand registers for
each CNU on the CLT would be at least "frivolous". The reason why I brought
it up during the call today was that I did not really know what to expect
and contrary to some opinions voiced on the call, register space is limited
and does have associated cost, so the fewer registers we actually need, the
better for us. We do have some register space left, but again, going and
consuming a large share of that for just one project would not be a good way
forward IMO.
Regards
Marek
From: Duane Remein [mailto:Duane.Remein@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February, 2013 9:53 PM
To: STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-EPOC] Minutes
Steve,
Sorry to have missed this call.
FYI I would have vote "Yes" on each of the straw polls.
I note from Table 45-3 that there are close to 31,000 registers still
available and that some past projects have reserved large blocks of
registers (see 1.340 through 1.699 & 1.740 through 1.1099 for example),
apparently for some future function so it doesn't appear we are in jeopardy
of breaking the bank on MDIO registers. That said I don't disagree that we
should not be frivolous; defining sub-carrier groups could go a long way to
conserving this limited resource.
Best Regards,
Duane
FutureWei Technologies Inc.
duane.remein@xxxxxxxxxx
Director, Access R&D
919 418 4741
Raleigh, NC
From: Shellhammer, Steve [mailto:sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 3:09 PM
To: STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-3-EPOC] Minutes
All,
Attached are the minutes of the RF Spectrum Ad Hoc call. For
those who were not on the call we held several straw polls which you can
review.
Steve
_____
<="" p="">
_____
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1