Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-3-EPOC] ePoll results for: Unofficial IEEE P802.3bn Task Force eStraw Poll #rfspectrum_9



Online straw poll closed at 2013-05-31 18:00:00 for:

Unofficial IEEE P802.3bn Task Force eStraw Poll #rfspectrum_9
FDD downstream lower band edge Question: (formatted for text):

"The FDD downstream lower frequency band edge supported by the PHY
should be:  (Reference: ad hoc committee minutes: RF
Spectrum_Minutes 5/28/13 )"
----------------------------------------------------
Vote type: Single answer selection per voter.
Summary of votes per answer (percent of total):
0)   85 MHz               =   2 (16.7%)
1)   108 MHz              =   5 (41.7%)
2)   120 MHz              =   0 (0.0%)
3)   174 MHz              =   0 (0.0%)
4)   240 MHz              =   0 (0.0%)
5)   252 MHz              =   1 (8.3%)
6)   300 MHz              =   0 (0.0%)
7)   550 MHz              =   0 (0.0%)
8)   Other (provide answer in Comments) =   4 (33.3%)

  Total votes =  12

________________________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1
"Full Name",Email,"Voting Member","Vote Date / Time",Answer,Comments
"Matthew Schmitt",m.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-28 15:17:02",single::::::5::::,
"Marek Hajduczenia",marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-28 15:18:12",single:0:::::::::,
"Hesham ElBakoury",hesham.elbakoury@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-28 15:19:42",single::1::::::::,
"Michel Allard",michel.allard@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-29 05:05:53",single:::::::::8:,"54 MHz i.e lowest usable frequency for systems with 42/54Mhz mid-split."
"William Keasler",wkeasler@xxxxxxxxxx,N,"2013-05-29 08:04:56",single:::::::::8:,"\"very low\" (Assuming the specification for an 802.3bn PHY is intended to cover both legacy and \"high split\" deployment scenarios)"
"Mike Darling",mike.darling@xxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-29 08:39:00",single::1::::::::,
"Keiji Tanaka",kj-tanaka@xxxxxxxxxxx,N,"2013-05-30 04:52:13",single:::::::::8:,"70 MHz"
"Leo Montreuil",leo.montreuil@xxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-30 06:37:31",single::1::::::::,
"Duane Remein",duane.remein@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-31 07:24:05",single:::::::::8:,"0 MHz (or something close to it). If there is a strong technical reason to limit this I would like to hear the argument. \"This is the way it\'s been done in the past\" is not a technical reason (imho)."
"Bill Powell",bill.powell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-31 10:36:37",single::1::::::::,
"tom staniec",tom.staniec@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-31 13:42:14",single:0:::::::::,
"Saifur Rahman",saifur_rahman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-31 14:38:22",single::1::::::::,


________________________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1