Re: [FE] Comment on 3.1.2
Pat,
I discussed this with Glenn Parsons, editor of 802.3as.
We agree with the dotted line approach and keeping it as a single figure. I'll
ask Glenn to make this change in the next draft. Thanks for your
review.
Kevin Daines
Chair, IEEE P802.3as
Since I may not be
able to attend the FE meeting, I'd like to submit a comment on 3.1.2.
The current figure
is inaccurate because it shows an FCS sourced from the MA_DATA.request with a
PAD not sourced from the MA_DATA.request.
There are at
least two ways this could be resolved
Make the arrow for
frame check sequence a dotted line, make the Pad sides dotted, add a statement
that FCS may only be sourced from the MA_DATA.request when there is no
PAD.
or do two figures -
one with PAD and no arrow from MA_DATA.request to PAD and one with no PAD and
MA_DATA.request providing FCS.
Regards,
Pat
All,
The meeting
materials for the next week's plenary meeting in Atlanta have been uploaded to
our web site. The URL below contains a direct link to the
webpage:
Many thanks to
Glenn Parsons, Editor, for pulling together an unofficial D0.1. It contains
proposed changes to Clauses 2, 3, 4, 31, and 31B. We'll review this draft and
hopefully come out of Atlanta with plans for our first Task Force
ballot.
Kevin
Daines
Chair, P802.3as
Frame Expansion Task Force