Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Along with a previous suggestion that we become more educated on the problems associated with n x 10G LAG implementations, I, for one, would like to better understand the concerns regarding what I'll call bit parallel vs serial implementations. There was an earlier post indicating MAC implementations might be in the order of 64 wide, maybe even 128. So at the one extreme, one could envision a parallel connection 64 wide, at the other extreme is time division multiplexing this down to a single serial stream. Note, that for this discusion, it does not matter whether the parallel paths are accomplished by individual cables, individual fibers in one cable, different wavelengths on a single fiber, or even individual traces on a backplane. As has been mentioned, there are various possibilities in between the extremes, such as 10x 10 Gig, N x M, etc.
There are, of course, the obvious cost and reliability issues of number of sources, detectors, fibers, connectors, space constraints, etc. But what about performance issues such as latency and throughput. How would bit parallel differ from LAG? Are there other issues as well?
This is a specific case of what could be considered a broader topic related to how we organize our work. In addition to, as Menachem suggested, prioritizing application spaces, perhaps building a knowledge foundation, whether through postings here, tutorial presentations, links to web sites, etc. could be an early part of the effort.
Jim Kevern
Principal Engineer - Applications
Fiber Optics Business Unit
tyco / Electronics
( phone: 717-986-5701
2 fax: 717-986-5449
: e-mail : james.kevern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
. Mailing Address:
U.S. Mail (except Express Mail, which REQUIRES a street address):
MS 258-002
PO Box 3608
Harrisburg, PA 17105-3608
Shipping Address:
UPS, FedEX, U.S. Express Mail, NOT U.S. Priority Mail:
MS 258-002
2900 Fulling Mill Road
Middletown, PA 17057