| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
All, From discussions I have had, I sense that
there may be some confusion regarding the proposal for adding a 40Gb/s MAC rate
objecitve. 40 Gb/s has been proposed as an additional MAC rate, not as a
replacement for the current objective of 100 Gb/s. The presentations given have focused on the
needs of servers / end stations: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/hssg/public/jan07/muller_01_0107.pdf http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/hssg/public/mar07/frazier_01_0307.pdf http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/hssg/public/mar07/vandoorn_01_0307.pdf I encourage all to review the above
presentations, and use the reflector to further discuss them and / or the
proposed objective. This will help to assist the SG in preparing for the
April Interim, as well as making decisions regarding the project’s objectives.
Best Regards, John D’Ambrosia From: John DAmbrosia
[mailto:jdambrosia@FORCE10NETWORKS.COM] Dear HSSG Members, As discussed in the action plan pulled together at the end
of the plenary week, further discussion on adding a 40G MAC rate as an
objective is needed. Topics of interest include: economic feasibility,
broad market potential, and what pmds are desired for this rate. I would like to encourage all to use the reflector for this
subject matter, which could assist individuals in their preparations for the
interim meeting next month. Best Regards, John D’Ambrosia |