| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dan and all, I apologize for the inappropriate selection
of vocabulary. Yes, I fully agree with your proposals to
move forward on 100G and not advance 40G. Regards, Daniel From: Dove, Dan [mailto:dan.dove@hp.com]
Daniel, Thank you for your support of my
presentation. You might note that I do not propose
"blocking 40G", but rather that we should not advance it. This might
seem like a subtle difference, but it is important. I will assume the framing of your
supporting note was unintentional and that you fully agree with me that we
should move forward on 100G and not move forward on 40G. Again, thanks.
From: Daniel
Cheok Kiang Kho [mailto:dkho@altera.com] Hi Dan, I support the content of your
presentation; and its motions to block a 40G PAR going forward, and to expedite
efforts on 100G. Regards, Daniel From: Dove, Dan
[mailto:dan.dove@HP.COM] Hello, Subsequent to yesterday's debate, I feel
it is necessary to address some of the issues raised in a formally
documented manner. I have produced a presentation which I
have requested authorization to present at today's meeting. If you support the
content of this presentation, please reply back to me asap. http://www.dovenetworking.com/Dove-02-May-HSSG.pdf I am open to feedback as well. Best Regards,
---- |