| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Bob and all WG members, Again, I apologize for the inappropriate
use of language. Please note that the phrasing of my earlier statement was
unintentional, and was merely to support Dan’s proposals. I have no
intention to cause anger or insult to anyone, and if I have, I would like to
apologize again. Please excuse my English as I do not live
in the States, and I am not aware of the intricacies of American culture. Regards, Daniel From: Grow, Bob
[mailto:bob.grow@INTEL.COM] Daniel: Statements such as you present below
are totally inappropriate. Such a statement can be asserted to be
anti-competitive with consequent risks to anyone making such a statement or
endorsing it. Bob Grow Vice Chair, IEEE-SA Standards Board Chair, IEEE 802.3 Working Group From: Daniel
Cheok Kiang Kho [mailto:dkho@ALTERA.COM] Hi Dan, I support the content of your
presentation; and its motions to block a 40G PAR going forward, and to expedite
efforts on 100G. Regards, Daniel From: Dove, Dan
[mailto:dan.dove@HP.COM] Hello, Subsequent to yesterday's debate, I feel
it is necessary to address some of the issues raised in a formally
documented manner. I have produced a presentation which I
have requested authorization to present at today's meeting. If you support the
content of this presentation, please reply back to me asap. http://www.dovenetworking.com/Dove-02-May-HSSG.pdf I am open to feedback as well. Best Regards,
---- |