Comments constructive (or otherwise) are welcome ;). Cheers Med On 1-Jun-07, at 6:40 AM, Marcus Duelk wrote:
Hi Chris,
thanks for your email. I agree that only a constructive discussion
will move us forward.
I personally find it a pity that the HSSG could not agree on accepting
Howard's motion since the *technical concerns* that many of us had
regarding transport compatibility would have been addressed.
My personal impression is that those who voted 'NO' on that motion
still have other types of concerns such as investment costs into both 40G
and 100G, or the possible negative impact of 40G on 100G. I hope that
these can be somehow addressed at the July meeting.
Again, my impression is that the technical concerns regarding 40 GbE
have been taken care of.
Marcus
..--
___________________________
Marcus Duelk
Bell Labs / Alcatel-Lucent
Crawford Hill HOH R-237
791 Holmdel-Keyport Road
Holmdel, NJ 07733, USA
fon +1 (732) 888-7086
fax +1 (732) 888-7074
|