Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Jeff,
Sorry, but you seem to have deemed ALL possibilities for
extending the link length unacceptable. To be clear:
1. Use of OM4 fiber with the current baseline proposal
specs WILL NOT yield extended link lengths.
2. 100m is unacceptable to many of our customers as the
only option - we would oppose that by itself.
3. Most customers want a single PMD.
4. The 20% premium at the module level seems to be in the
noise for 40100G optics.
We need to discuss this further all the call
today.
Best regards,
Steve From: Jeff Maki [mailto:jmaki@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 10:02 PM To: STDS-802-3-HSSG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [802.3BA] XR ad hoc Phone Conference Notice Dear MMF XR Ad Hoc Committee
Members, I believe our current objective of
“at least 100 meters on OM3 MMF” should remain as a primary goal, the
baseline. Support for any form of extended reach should be
con Not
Acceptable: 1. Cost increase for the baseline
PMD (optic) in order to obtain greater than 100-meter
reach 2. EDC on the system/host board in
any case 3. CDR on the system/host board as
part of the baseline solution 4. EDC in the baseline PMD
(optic) 5. CDR in the baseline PMD (optic)
Acceptable: 1. Use of OM4
fiber 2. Process maturity that yields
longer reach with no cost increase In summary, we should not burden the
baseline solution with cost increases to meet the needs of an extended-reach
solution. Sincerely, Jeffery
Maki ———————————————— Jeffery J. Maki,
Ph.D. Principal Optical
Engineer Juniper Networks,
Inc. Voice
+1-408-936-8575 FAX
+1-408-936-3025 www.juniper.net ———————————————— |