Re: [8023-POEP] Classification Ad Hoc
Hi guys
I suggest focusing on Layer 1 first.
Layer 2 can be handled by Hugh and its group of volunteers.
If I remember correctly, Hugh had to prepare some initial document which
describes layer 2 requirements for supporting classification which will
be reviewed and discussed by its ad-hoc (those who interested to
contribute for promoting this work). I am fully support this work and
already allocate manpower to help Hugh with it.
I believe that layer 2 support will be easier to handle by the group and
less controversial than layer 1 hence better utilization of our time.
Yair
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hugh Barrass
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 9:37 PM
To: STDS-802-3-POEP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [8023-POEP] Classification Ad Hoc
Clay,
I would appreciate some of the time for L2 management discussions - if
it looks like one call will be overloaded by that then I will set up
separate calls. My hope is that 5 hours of con call should be enough to
cover L1, L2 and find a solution for world peace...
Hugh.
Clay Stanford (LTC) wrote:
>Wael,
>
>At this point, I would propose that the ad hoc would
>cover both layer 1 and layer 2 classification. At a
>later time we might focus or split into two groups.
>
>clay
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>