| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Yair: Whether the meeting ended before the time
you and Dave had anticipated, it did not end prematurely. The meeting
ended when there was no more work on the agenda of the Task Force. While we
generally try to accommodate everyone, failing to request time is not my or the
committee’s problem. The take away from this is that if you want to
present, create a presentation and submitted a week before our meeting like you
are supposed to so that it can be properly placed on the agenda and the task
force will honor the agenda. Cheers Mike
Business Development Manager, Power over
Ethernet Products Voice: +1 603 222 8686 From:
owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yair Darshan Steve and all, I hope during the next week or so we will
have something that worse to discuss over the reflector. Regarding SS vs DS; I still believe that
this question is important but secondary in importance compared to
architecture. Once we agreed on architecture it will be
clear what is the best next move (I hope..). (may be if each 2P is
independently specified then you will have SS for each 2P which is effectively
DS on all 4P etc.) Meantime until the next meeting, we can
summarize all inputs regarding SS vs DS for reference (which are the
presentations shown last meeting + adding all new inputs received during the
meeting) and start discuss it after we will be on agreement on the
architecture. Yair From:
owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Guys, This email is intended for people who are interested in the
DS vs. SS debate, or the classification adhoc. If you’re not one of
those people then please disregard this. Unfortunately, no decision was reached in the This issue is far too important to just let it sit until the
plenary. We must have it all figured out before the plenary, otherwise we
probably won’t reach a decision then either. And, as we all know, the
802.3at Task Force is already way behind schedule. My question is, how should we proceed from here? So
far, the discussion forum has been the classification adhoc, but this is really
outside their scope. Should the Task Force start a new adhoc, or morph
the classification adhoc into a system architecture adhoc? I think we need to make a decision quickly, and continue the
debate aggressively. Steve |