Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

[8023-POEP] Notes for standard writing

To: STDS-802-3-POEP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [8023-POEP] Notes for standard writing
From: Derek Koonce <derek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:18:01 -0700
In-Reply-To: <006e01c69084$ff1de570$6401a8c0@OFFICE>
List-Help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-3-POEP>, <mailto:LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?body=INFO STDS-802-3-POEP>
List-Owner: <mailto:STDS-802-3-POEP-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-POEP-subscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-POEP-unsubscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <006e01c69084$ff1de570$6401a8c0@OFFICE>
Reply-To: derek@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

Title:

All,
I am trying to keep track of what we need to ensure is included in the .at standard when all the dust settles. I just want everyone to know that I'll be noting the extra's we should consider including in the standard.

Recently Martin commented about ensuring that "basica assumptions" are made in an addendum (email 6/12/06 @ 12:33).

I've also noted that we need to ensure there is a "definition" section that will have updated information as well.

If there are others, please respond so that I can add to my list.

Sorry I have not participated in the ad-hoc. My cell phone minutes have been racking up a lot lately.

Derek Koonce

References:
- Re: [8023-POEP] isolation problem
  - From: Steve Robbins

Prev by Date: [8023-POEP] My thoughts on L2 protocol for PoE
Next by Date: Re: [8023-POEP] isolation problem
Prev by thread: Re: [8023-POEP] isolation problem
Next by thread: [8023-POEP] System Architecture - updates rev 003
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread