Re: [8023-POEP] The new SOA
Chad-
We could do "Area of Required Operation"
But I don't like that as much.
Further, if you look in:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aro
while there is nothing specifically interfering, it is not as clean an area
into which you can drop a new meaning.
I believe that "Area of Specified Operation" (ASO)
- is a winner
- is new and in clean territory
- is far enough away from "Safe Operating Area" to not be a problem.
Geoff
At 10:50 AM 10/18/2007 , Chad Jones (cmjones) wrote:
>Good suggestions. The only issue is that the group has decided that not
>only do they desire to remove SAFE but also they desire to move away
>from an acronym that is widely know in the industry as implying safe as
>SOA does. So a whole new term and acronym is desired, preferably one
>that doesn't have an S in it.
>
>
>-Chad
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-stds-802-3-poep@IEEE.ORG
>[mailto:owner-stds-802-3-poep@IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Steve Carlson
>Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 1:43 PM
>To: STDS-802-3-POEP@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: [8023-POEP] The new SOA
>
>I like "Area of Specified Operation".
>
>Regards,
>
>Steve
>
>Steven B. Carlson
>Executive Secretary, IEEE 802.3 Working Group
>http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/index.html
>President
>High Speed Design, Inc.
>11929 NW Old Quarry Road
>Portland, OR 97229
>503.626.4206
>scarlson@hspdesign.com