Re: [8023-POEP] The new SOA
Sounds good enough to me.
Yair
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-poep@IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-3-poep@IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Chad Jones
(cmjones)
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:38 PM
To: STDS-802-3-POEP@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [8023-POEP] The new SOA
That's the best proposal yet. We can continue to call it SOA in the
meetings but is will be figure 33-X in the text.
-Chad
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-poep@IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-3-poep@IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of D. Matthew Landry
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:01 AM
To: STDS-802-3-POEP@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [8023-POEP] The new SOA
Just a thought -- but do we even need another acronym? Why don't we just
refer to the figure as required and see how that goes?
-m
On 10/21/07, Wael Diab <wdiab@broadcom.com> wrote:
> Same here.
>
> Wael
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: owner-stds-802-3-poep@IEEE.ORG <owner-stds-802-3-poep@IEEE.ORG>
> To: STDS-802-3-POEP@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> <STDS-802-3-POEP@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Thu Oct 18 10:43:07 2007
> Subject: [8023-POEP] The new SOA
>
> I like "Area of Specified Operation".
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
> Steven B. Carlson
> Executive Secretary, IEEE 802.3 Working Group
> http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/index.html
> President
> High Speed Design, Inc.
> 11929 NW Old Quarry Road
> Portland, OR 97229
> 503.626.4206
> scarlson@hspdesign.com
>