RE: Specifying Discovery
I agree that It is the right way to continue since we now have detection
method.
The spec should specify the signature element in the PD and specifying the
signal parameters sent from the PSE in away that live freedom to the
designer for different implementations in the PSE side..
Roger and Rick: If you need help in gathering data or using our experience
with DC type discovery, please let me know.
Best Regards
Yair.
Darshan Yair
Chief R&D Engineer
> PowerDsine Ltd. - Powering Converged Networks
> 1 Hanagar St., P.O. Box 7220
> Neve Ne'eman Industrial Zone
> Hod Hasharon 45421, Israel
Tel: +972-9-775-5100, Cell: +972-54-893019
Fax: +972-9-775-5111
> E-mail: <mailto:yaird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> http://www.powerdsine.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Muir, Robert [SMTP:robert.muir@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: ו, נובמבר 17, 2000 11:21 AM
> To: 'Paul Moore'; stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Specifying Discovery
>
> I agree with both Paul and Roger on the content for the spec. regarding
> discovery.
>
> Roger if there is anything I can do help in the effort that you and Rick
> have begun let me know.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Robert.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Moore [mailto:pamoore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 16 November 2000 23:33
> To: stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Specifying Discovery
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm sure others have already thought of this, but having a dialog
> might help us get to completion sooner, so here goes.
>
> Now that there is a discovery method on the table I began thinking
> about how we specify it. Seems to me we only need to specify the identity
> network on the PD end, some sort of simple limitations on the PSE
> discovery signals, and then put an annex in the standard showing a proven
> implementation. The actual method used to do discovery in the PSE should
> be left to the individual implementor. Things like radiated and conducted
> noise, noise susceptibility, ESD susceptibility, etc. need not be in the
> spec., but an annex might point out the relevant documents governing them.
> I'm sure I've missed a few things here, but seems to me the actual spec.
> part is pretty short. Comments??
>
> \Paul
>
>
>
> Paul B. Moore
>
> Senior Manager, Hardware Engineering
>
> Small Business Solutions - Santa Clara
>
> Nortel Networks
>
> 4401 Great America Parkway
>
> PO Box 58185, MS SC05-02
>
> Santa Clara, CA 95052-8185
>
> Phone: 408-495-2466
>
> FAX: 408-495-5615
>
>
> Hi
>
> Paul is right, and I just want the rest of the group to know that Rick and
> I have been doing some
> work and been gathering data (feasability/spec), as soon as it comes
> together we
> will share it with you and Mike McCormack so he can draft some of it.....
>
> so now you know, I hope the rest of the silent people in the group are
> looking at the details
> we need to help Mike write the draft and be fair to him (allow him enough
> time to do so...)
>
> 2c...
> regards,
> roger
>
>
>
>