[802.3af] Re: AW: Liaison report from ISO/IEC JTC 1 SC 25/WG 3 on mid-span pow er insertion
Walter-
Your most recent question is a little different than your personal
question that was covered on the cover page of the liaison letter.
The position of the current draft is that.
If power
is being inserted on the cabling from the switch/repeater towards the DTE
(i.e. not mid-span insertion) then either the pairs on pins 1-2, 3-6
(Alternative A) or the pairs on pins 4-5, 7-8 (Alternative B), but not
both.
If the
power is inserted on the cabling with a mid-span then the proposed
standard mandates Alternative B.
The normal expectation is that the pairs used for power in a mid-span
would not provide continuity through the mid-span. Those pairs on the
unpowered side of the mid-span are expected to be unused but properly
terminated. This is not mandated, however. The draft states in 33.2.2
that:
"Midspan PSE must use
alternative B as described in section 33.2.1.Midspan PSE are limited to
operation with 10BASE-T and 100BASE-TX systems,1000BASE-T is beyond the
scope of this standard."
So it may be possible to build a Midspan PSE that would serve
1000BASE-T. Many people think this is possible. We have not investigated
it during this project.
I hope that provides a definitive answer to your question.
Best regards,
Geoff
At 08:10 AM 3/16/02 +0100, Pattay Walter wrote:
Dear Geoff,
thanks for this quick answer that - if complete and future proof -
makes
life much easier.
But to be on the safe side, let me confirm explicitly: there is no need
for
us to consider mid-span-power insertion for applications using all
four
pairs for information transfer.
Kind regards
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Geoff Thompson
[mailto:gthompso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet am: Sonntag, 10. März 2002 06:31
An: Pattay Walter
Cc: Alan Flatman; scarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; thompson@xxxxxxxx;
stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: Liaison report from ISO/IECJTC 1 SC 25/WG 3 on mid-span
power
insertion
Dear Walter-
We will review your Liaison at our meeting in St. Louis during the
upcoming
week
Re: your text on the cover of the Liaison Letter:
==========================================
Due to the discussion in Kyoto it would be important for WG 3 to
know whether mid-span power insertion will always use separate
pairs, that is pairs which are not used for information transfer or
whether there is also a need to provide this function for pairs
used
for information, e. g. when only two pairs are terminated at the
TO.
The next meeting of WG 3 will take place near Washington,
D.C., USA, 2002-09-23/26.
==========================================
The answer to the above question is as follows:
Mid-span will always use separate pairs.
End-to-end may use either the data pairs or the "separate
pairs" but not
both.
Therefore, mid-span may not be used in a situation where only 2 pairs
are
terminated at the TO
I hope to be able to attend the upcoming meeting in the Washington,
D.C.
area.
Best regards,
Geoff
At 11:36 AM 3/6/02 +0100, you wrote:
Dear Geoff,
please receive the liaison report as it was approved at our last meeting.
Unluckily we were short of time - as usual - and not all the output
already
created on this subject was found complete or ripe enough to be
forwarded
to you in this report.
We definitely will do some more work on this subject at our next meeting.
As
the outcome may be an interface to generic cabling in addition to
those
defined in the present model, it promises to be a challenging
subject.
Hoping to see you there again I remain with best wishes
yours sincerely
Walter
|=========================================|
| Geoffrey O.
Thompson
|
| Nortel Networks, Inc. M/S
SC5-02 |
| 4401 Great America
Parkway
|
| P. O. Box
58185
|
| Santa Clara, CA 95052-8185
USA |
| Phone: +1 408 495
1339
|
| Fax: +1 408 495
5615
|
| E-Mail: gthompso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|=========================================|