RE: [802.3af] comment #148

["Chad Jones" <cmjones@xxxxxxxxx>]

He is asking to recraft the third paragraph and move it.

 

Chad Jones

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Yair Darshan
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:23 PM
To: 'cmjones@xxxxxxxxx'; AF Reflector (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [802.3af] comment #148

 

David's remedy looks clear to me.

Yair.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chad Jones [mailto:cmjones@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:56 AM
To: AF Reflector (E-mail)
Subject: [802.3af] comment #148

Colleagues: please look over this comment and maybe we can re-craft the text before the meeting.

 

-----------

CommentID:  148

CommenterName:  Law, David

CommenterEmail:  David_Law@xxxxxxxx

CommenterPhone:  +44 131 659 8218

CommenterFax:  +44 7711 502962

CommenterCo:  3Com

Clause:  33

Subclause:  33.2.4

Page:  44

Line:  36

CommentType:  E

 

Comment: 

The third paragraph states that 'PD detection is independent of data link status.' however is it the entire PSE operation that's independent of data link status, not just PD detection. Suggest that the entire third paragraph is reworded and moved to the PSE introduction in subclause 33.2.

CommentEnd: 

 

SuggestedRemedy: 

Delete the third paragraph of this subclause. Add the text 'PSE operation is independent of data link status.'.

RemedyEnd: 

 

Response: 

 

ResponseEnd: 

CommentStatus:  X

ResponseStatus:  O

Topic: 

CreateDate:  1/2/2003

LastModDate:  1/2/2003

DispatchDate: 

WrittenDate: 

Accept_RejectDate: 

Closed_UnsatisfDate: 

VoterStatus:

 

Chad Jones                                    cmjones@xxxxxxxxx

Hardware Engineer                        Phone: 330-664-7818

WNBU Engineering                        Fax: 330-664-7990

Cisco Systems

320 Springside Drive

Suite 350

Akron, OH 44333-4500                  www.cisco.com