| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | 
| 
 Charles- 
I 
would suggest that you find a consultant familiar with EN60950/IEC60950. He will 
be able to assist you far better than this reflector.  
Again, 
let me stress that the actual clearances required will be a function of your 
particular application, device characteristics, and operating 
environment. These may be determined from an exhaustive reading of EN60950. 
It isn't fun or easy, but it's the only way. Let me give you some 
examples: 
a) 
your PD is an IP phone - its environment is a standard office (no salt water, 
conductive dust, etc.) and there is no source of mains voltage in your PD. Your 
device is SELV and will have the most relaxed requirements for 
spacings/clearance/creepage. 
b) 
your PD is a motor controller - the control logic runs from 802.3af power, but 
the motors operate on 440 VAC. The controller is in a steel mill. In this case, 
your environment is completely different from the benign office cubicle. EN60950 
would not even be the appropriate safety standard; in the US UL508 for 
industrial controls would be the correct one, and in Europe the industrial 
section of the CE Low Voltage Directive. Spacings, creepage and clearances would 
be much more severe due to the environment and the high mains 
voltages. 
The 
term "adequate separation" is undefined precisely because the requirements may 
vary per the above examples. 
Finally, Clause 14.3.1.1 defines several methods of measuring isolation 
that use testing methodology defined in EN60950:1991. It  does not 
indicate conformance with EN60950, but simply uses the test methods of 
EN60950. Please note that three different methods are available for doing the 
isolation testing and the implementer may chose whichever one they 
want. 
 Prior to P802.3af, isolation in 802.3 was intended to prevent earth 
loops and to eliminate common-mode voltage problems with the data communications 
interface. The 802.3 standard is not a safety standard. The amendment of 
P802.3af is also not a safety standard, but provides pointers to EN60950:2001 to 
formally recognize the concept of the Limited Power Source and to align 
isolation testing with the 2001 edition. Again, these pointers are used to 
define testing techniques for determining isolation for the data communications 
interface. P802.3af will open a maintenance request to determine of the 
references to EN60950:1991 may be updated in all cases to point to 
EN60950:2001. 
Regards, 
Steven B. 
Carlson 
President Co-Chair, ESTA Control Protocols Working Group Chair, ESTA ACN Task Group http://www.esta.org Chair, IEEE 802.3af DTE Power via MDI Task Force http://www.ieee802.org/3/af/index.html Secretary, IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD Working Group http://www.ieee802.org/3/ High Speed Design, Inc. 11929 NW Old Quarry Road Portland, OR 97229 503.626.4206 FAX 503.626.4206 scarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  |