Re: [RE] Synchronous ethernet discussions
Dennis-
Whatever you post, make sure that it doesn't have any copyright or
confidentiality notices...
Steve
Steven B. Carlson
President
Chair, ESTA ACN Task Group
http://www.esta.org
Secretary, IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD Working Group
http://www.ieee802.org/3/
High Speed Design, Inc.
11929 NW Old Quarry Road
Portland, OR 97229
503.626.4206
FAX 503.626.4206
scarlson@hspdesign.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-re@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-3-re@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG]On Behalf Of Dennis Lou
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 5:00 PM
To: STDS-802-3-RE@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [RE] Synchronous ethernet discussions
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 23:19, Alexei Beliaev wrote:
> As for the choice between 1000 and 100/1000, I would risk to say that the
> problem is easily solvable for 10/100...
Although the problem is solvable, I think home A/V applications will
need greater speeds.
> At the Gigabit speed, all cable wires are already used but the throughput
> looks sufficient for carrying both synchronous and non-synchronous data. I
> wonder if someone from Pioneer could post the old Sync-E presentation as
an
> example.
I'm not sure which presentation you are referring.
-Dennis