Re: [RE] What's wrong with FireWire?
Funny,
I was thinking the same thing. Maybe what they want is a new 1394 PHY for Cat-5.
-=Scott
Hugh Barrass wrote:
> All,
>
> So far there has been some discussion on the subject of "what's wrong
> with Ethernet" for the home network and, as far as I can see it, the
> main response seems to be "it's not FireWire." So, could someone with
> expertise in this field summarize what the deficiencies are with IEEE
> 1394 that require it to be replaced with an enhanced IEEE 802.3?
>
> It strikes me that the problem of bridging:
>
> <-- IEEE 1394 -->...<-- IEEE 802.3 -->...<-- IEEE 1394 -->
>
> would be best served by:
>
> <-- IEEE 1394 -->...<-- IEEE 1394 -->...<-- IEEE 1394 -->
>
> Hugh.
>