Re: [RE] Monday RE discussion announcement
John,
A related email has (I believe) resolved the issue;
with my acceptance of Bob Grow's terminology suggestion.
Personally, I prefer to work within the 802.3 written
rules, not relying on the context used within other
standards.
DVJ
David V. James
3180 South Ct
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Home: +1.650.494.0926
+1.650.856.9801
Cell: +1.650.954.6906
Fax: +1.360.242.5508
Base: dvj@alum.mit.edu
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-stds-802-3-re@ieee.org
>> [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-re@ieee.org]On Behalf Of John Grant
>> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 9:59 AM
>> To: STDS-802-3-RE@listserv.ieee.org
>> Subject: Re: [RE] Monday RE discussion announcement
>>
>>
>> At 07:53 24/02/2005 -0800, you wrote:
>> >Bill,
>> >
>> >I still see no definition of the word "adhoc", the use of
>> >which Bob Grow seems to object. My assumption was always
>> >that adhoc implied unofficial.
>>
>> That's definitely not the case in some standards bodies: see
>> http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/ad-hoc_groups.htm for instance.
>>
>>
>> John Grant
>> ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
>> | || || || | | || || || || |
>> | N || i || n || e | | T || i || l || e || s |
>> |___||___||___||___| |___||___||___||___||___|
>>
>> Nine Tiles Networks Ltd, Cambridge, England
>> +44 1223 862599 and +44 1223 511455
>> http://www.ninetiles.com