Re: [RE] ClassA traffic pacing approaches
Title: Re: [RE] ClassA traffic pacing approaches
There have been no decisions. The gating approach has some specific advantages in terms of traffic shaping, but there is no consensus on this...
On 6/6/05 7:45 AM, "Max Azarov" <Max.Azarov@smsc.com> wrote:
Hello all,
Browsing through the available documentation I couldn't get a feeling on which traffic pacing algorithms are under the consideration in the RE group. In the detailed paper by David James there seems to be a "gating" approach. Does this mean that this is the consensus at the moment? In general, is this group trying to establish a specific recommended/mandated pacing approach or just some mandatory performance requirements for this matter?
Thanks in advance for clarification,
Max Azarov.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael D. Johas Teener — mikejt@broadcom.com
office +1-408-922-7542 cell +1-831-247-9666 fax +1-831-480-5845
http://public.xdi.org/=Michael.Johas.Teener - PGP ID 0x3179D202
---------------------------------------------------------------