Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Comment on "Synchronization Requirements in Cellular Networks over Ethernet" presentation

To: <STDS-802-3-TIME@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <STDS-802-1-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Comment on "Synchronization Requirements in Cellular Networks over Ethernet" presentation
From: "Maggi, Giovanni (EXT-Other - IT/Milan)" <giovanni.maggi.ext@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:03:46 +0200
Approved-by: scarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "Pietilainen, Antti (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <antti.pietilainen@xxxxxxx>, "Kapanen, Jouko (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <jouko.kapanen@xxxxxxx>, "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@xxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-3-TIME>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-802-3-TIME>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-802-3-TIME-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-TIME-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-TIME-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-802-3-time@xxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcnUayL8S7whQ6QoRkq4blXNGhMX0g==
Thread-topic: Comment on "Synchronization Requirements in Cellular Networks over Ethernet" presentation

Dear Rhee, Lee and Kim, 

I've read your presentation on "Synchronization Requirements in Cellular
Networks over Ethernet", I need a clarification regarding page number
12.
Why do you consider that 1588 may be adequate for WiMAX and not suitable
to support legacy 2G/3G?
I mean, why do you think that 1588 can not be used to support 2G/3G? 
Which requirements can not be fulfilled? 

Best Regards,
Giovanni Maggi

Prev by Date: FW: [802ALL:] Hotel Room & Registration Cut Off Approaching - Book Now !!!
Next by Date: May 2009 Web Page Updated
Previous by thread: May 2009 Web Page Updated
Next by thread: FW: [802ALL:] Hotel Room & Registration Cut Off Approaching - Book Now !!!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread