| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
I forwarded James our discussion on the issue under separate cover. I don't see anything that precludes it in the rules and the expedited process does allow approval at "any other meeting". I would suggest that if it can be done on the consent agenda, and
there is no compelling reason to do it earlier, then just avoid the surprised looks from people and short circuit the explanation and do it at the closing. George Zimmerman, Ph.D.
President & Principal
CME Consulting, Inc.
Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications
george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
310-920-3860
On Feb 5, 2025, at 2:40 PM, Clint Powell <cpowell@xxxxxxxx> wrote: James,
Since it did not seem to be specifically precluded and since it is a Corrigendum PAR - really not much to review or to be contentious about, I thought it would be easier if we just took care of it earlier in the week.
The Closing Consent Agenda works just as well, and I leave that decision up to you as it is the chair's prerogative.
BR,
Clint
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-LMSC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-LMSC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-LMSC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-LMSC&A=1 |