Re: [LinkSec] Re: [802.1] P802.1d/D3 to Sponsor ballot
Tony,
Will you be ready to consider a proposition
of procedural model, formed as a formal
comment during this revision?
(B.T.W - what is a format of such comment?)
Or: does the WG definitely, decidedly and
fundamentally stand up against including
procedural models?
Regards, Thom
--- Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote: >
> Thomas -
>
> We have no plans at present to put a procedural
> model of RSTP in the
> standard, and no-one has proposed doing that as a
> formal comment during
> this revision.
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
> At 18:51 21/05/2003 +1000, Thomas Jeffry wrote:
>
> >Tony,
> >
> >May I on this stage to ask about a
> >procedural model of RSTP?
> >Is WG going to insert as an anex
> >some procedural model?
> >The nice rstplib
> >http://rstplib.sourceforge.net/
> >of Alex Rozen may be a template for that.
> >
> >Regards, Thom
> >
> > --- Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote: >
> > > I have uploaded draft 3 of the 802.1D revision
> to:
> > >
> > >
>
>http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/d-rev-drafts/d3/802-1d-D3.zip
> > >
> > > user: p8021
> > > password: go_wildcats
> > >
> > > This Zip file contains the draft and the cover
> > > letter that will accompany
> > > it for the Sponsor ballot, which should start
> soon.
> > > Please note that only
> > > those people that signed up to be members of the
> > > Sponsor ballot group will
> > > receive the Sponsor ballot announcement.
> However, if
> > > anyone that is not a
> > > member of the Sponsor ballot group has comments
> to
> > > make on this draft, I
> > > will make my usual offer to submit their
> comments as
> > > part of my own Sponsor
> > > ballot response.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tony
> > >
> > >
> >
> >http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Mobile
> >- Check & compose your email via SMS on your
> Telstra or Vodafone mobile.
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
>
http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Mobile
- Check & compose your email via SMS on your Telstra or Vodafone mobile.