Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

RE: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame Format)

To: mick_seaman@ieee.org
Subject: RE: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame Format)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:30:27 -0400
Cc: <stds-802-linksec@ieee.org>
In-Reply-To: <002a01c324a7$90ad9820$210110ac@corp.telseon.com>
References: <003501c3249a$b9628170$051efea9@Pam>
Sender: owner-stds-802-linksec@majordomo.ieee.org


Mick:

I simply cannot agree.  I do not believe that it is better for 802 to have 
two standards in this area.  I believe that it is better to update the 
existing 802.10 standard than make a new one.  Otherwise, 802 will have two 
standards that occupy the same place in the protocol stack.

Russ

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame Format)
  - From: "Mick Seaman" <mick_seaman@ieee.org>

References:
- Re: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame Format)
  - From: "Ken Alonge" <kenneth.alonge@verizon.net>
- RE: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame Format)
  - From: "Mick Seaman" <mick_seaman@ieee.org>

Prev by Date: RE: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame Format)
Next by Date: RE: [LinkSec] Teleconf notes 5/27/03 (5 criteria update)
Prev by thread: RE: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame Format)
Next by thread: RE: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame Format)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread