Re: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame Format)
Mick-
If LinkSec is going to basically re-create a scaled down SDE, then why re-do
everything from scratch -- let's just modify SDE to everyone's satisfaction
and get it over with.
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mick Seaman" <mick_seaman@ieee.org>
To: "'Russ Housley'" <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: <stds-802-linksec@ieee.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:11 AM
Subject: RE: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame
Format)
>
>
> Then withdraw the old one.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 6:30 AM
> To: mick_seaman@ieee.org
> Cc: stds-802-linksec@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: [LinkSec] Proposed 5 criteria for LinkSec PAR (Secure Frame
> Format)
>
>
> Mick:
>
> I simply cannot agree. I do not believe that it is better for 802 to have
> two standards in this area. I believe that it is better to update the
> existing 802.10 standard than make a new one. Otherwise, 802 will have
two
> standards that occupy the same place in the protocol stack.
>
> Russ
>
>
>
>