[LinkSec] Fwd: [802.1] IETF EAP WG last call on RFC 2284bis
F.Y.I.
Regards,
Tony
>Envelope-to: tony@jeffree.co.uk
>Subject: [802.1] IETF EAP WG last call on RFC 2284bis
>Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:25:32 -0700
>X-MS-Has-Attach:
>X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
>Thread-Topic: IETF EAP WG last call on RFC 2284bis
>Thread-Index: AcMyCIFPSXyYQSqCTh+vMStcII1MnwCAkH/5
>From: "Bernard Aboba" <bernarda@windows.microsoft.com>
>To: <stds-802-1@ieee.org>
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2003 13:27:15.0765 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[00B4F650:01C3340B]
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0
> tests=BAYES_10
> version=2.55-ieee_anti_spam
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55-ieee_anti_spam
>(1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by majordomo2.ieee.org
>id h5GDQGwx021145
>Sender: owner-stds-802-1@majordomo.ieee.org
>X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <stds-802-1@majordomo.ieee.org>
>X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to majordomo@majordomo.ieee.org
>X-Moderator-Address: stds-802-1-approval@majordomo.ieee.org
>
>
>This is an announcement of IETF EAP WG last call on RFC 2284bis, prior to
>sending it on to the IESG for consideration as an IETF Proposed Standard.
>
>The draft is not yet available on the IETF archive, but should be there by
>Wednesday or Thursday at the latest. Until then, it is available for
>examination here:
>http://www.levkowetz.com/pub/ietf/drafts/eap/draft-ietf-eap-rfc2284bis-04.e.txt
>
>When it arrives on the archive, the document will be available for
>examination here:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eap-rfc2284bis-04.txt
>
>IETF EAP WG last call will last until July 7, 2003. Please send comments to
>the EAP WG mailing list (eap@frascone.com) in the format specified on the
>EAP Issues list:
>http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/EAP/eapissues.html
>
>Note: This document includes changes to requirements for
>supplicant, authenticator and AAA server implementations.
>Since this may be the last EAP WG last call on this document,
>if you have not yet read the document thoroughly, now would
>be a good time.
Regards,
Tony