IEEE 802 SEC
Email Archive

Date Index (Page 523 of 597)

RE: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation
- From: "Stevenson, Carl R (Carl)" <carlstevenson@agere.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 07:03:27 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ Ballot on WG Membership
- From: Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 05:50:37 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation
- From: Bob Heile <bheile@ieee.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 01:15:03 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ Ballot on WG Membership
- From: <mjsherman@research.att.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 00:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] +++ SEC EMAIL BALLOT +++ BALLOT RESULT: PASS---Letter Ballot to Disband Working Group 802.6
- From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 15:06:15 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] +++ SEC EMAIL BALLOT +++ BALLOT RESULT: PASS---Letter Ballot to Disband Working Group 802.7
- From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 15:06:15 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom
- From: "Stevenson, Carl R (Carl)" <carlstevenson@agere.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:16:16 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 toRevCom
- From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:04:03 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom
- From: "Grow, Bob" <bob.grow@intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:13:57 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ Ballot on WG Membership
- From: "Grow, Bob" <bob.grow@intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:06:46 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] report of P1802.16.1/D3 under Procedure 10
- From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:01:55 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom
- From: "Bob O'Hara" <bob@airespace.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:44:22 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] A small blurb on Vic Hayes
- From: "Robert D. Love" <rdlove@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:44:13 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] RE: Reflector messed up
- From: pat_thaler@agilent.com
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:28:10 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] A small blurb on Vic Hayes
- From: <mjsherman@research.att.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:48:21 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ Ballot on WG Membership
- From: <mjsherman@research.att.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 00:44:58 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WGInitial membership interpretation
- From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:21:13 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation
- From: "Grow, Bob" <bob.grow@intel.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:15:50 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] [Fwd: Stds Process article I spoke about at StdsBd]
- From: "Bob O'Hara" <bob@airespace.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] Reminder of April 22 2003 802.20 leadership call
- From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation
- From: <mjsherman@research.att.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:00:35 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation
- From: Mike Takefman <tak@cisco.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:48:41 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation
- From: Bill Quackenbush <billq@attglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:20:04 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation
- From: Geoff Thompson <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 19:46:08 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom
- From: "Jim Lansford" <jimlans@mobilian.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:02:22 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom
- From: "Stevenson, Carl R (Carl)" <carlstevenson@agere.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 07:18:32 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] Report on 15.2 Recirculation Ballot
- From: Bob Heile <bheile@ieee.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:05:15 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom
- From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:21:00 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] Report on 15.2 Recirculation Ballot
- From: "Grow, Bob" <bob.grow@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:37:39 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] 802 email
- From: "Bob O'Hara" <bob@airespace.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:30:03 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] Endorsement letter for Carl Stevenson to IEEE-SA
- From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:35:55 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] Report on 15.2 Recirculation Ballot
- From: Bob Heile <bheile@ieee.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] April 15 2003 802.20 leadership conference call minutes
- From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:07:04 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] BoG and SA Call for Candidates - 2004 for 2005
- From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 20:35:34 -0400 (EDT)
[802SEC] Fw: Call for Candidates for 2004
- From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:03:26 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation
- From: "Robert D. Love" <rdlove@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:50:08 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be a CLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculation case, with changes marked)????
- From: "Grow, Bob" <bob.grow@intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:14:29 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be a CLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculation case, with changes marked)????
- From: Geoff Thompson <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:06:48 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be a CLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculation case, with changes marked)????
- From: Howard Frazier <millardo@dominetsystems.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:37:48 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be aCLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculationcase, with changes marked)????
- From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:11:17 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be a CLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculation case, with changes marked)????
- From: Geoff Thompson <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation
- From: <mjsherman@research.att.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:42:01 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be a CLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculation case, with changes marked)????
- From: "Grow, Bob" <bob.grow@intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:39:10 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be aCLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculationcase, with changes marked)????
- From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:31:00 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be a CLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculation case, with changes marked)????
- From: Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:25:15 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be a CLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculation case, with changes marked)????
- From: Howard Frazier <millardo@dominetsystems.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:19:01 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be a CLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculation case, with changes marked)????
- From: Geoff Thompson <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:10:49 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be aCLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculationcase, with changes marked)????
- From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:32:04 -0400 (EDT)
Re: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be a CLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculation case, with changes marked)????
- From: Howard Frazier <millardo@dominetsystems.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:58:38 -0400 (EDT)
RE: [802SEC] Should all IEEE 802 drafts coming for sale be a CLEAN file or should they be offered as they come (in the recirculation case, with changes marked)????
- From: Geoff Thompson <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:05:01 -0400 (EDT)

Return to top of Page

Return to IEEE 802 Web Site

Mail converted by MHonArc

IEEE 802 SECEmail Archive

Date Index (Page 523 of 597)

IEEE 802 SEC
Email Archive