| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
The tally and final document (after comments) is below: Howard Frazier - Bob Grow - Approve with Editorial Comments Paul Nikolich - Disapprove Buzz Rigsbee - Approve with Editorial Comments Bill Lidinsky - Approve with Editorial Comments Dave Carlson - Approve Geoff Thompson - Approve (LATE VOTE APPROVE - DID NOT MAKE LETTER DEADLINE) Bob Love - Abstain Jim Mollenauer - Chip Benson - Approve D. Vaman - Approve Vic Hayes - Approve Pat Thaler - Abstain Robert Russell - Approve Bob Heile - Approve Roger Marks - Approve with Editorial Comments Jim Carlo - Approve Approve: 12 Do Not Approve: 1 Abstain: 2 Did Not Vote: 1 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ SEC OFFICIAL EMAIL BALLOT 802.0/28Sept1999 Issue Date: 28Sept1999 Closing Date: 1October1999 Moved By: Vic Hayes Seconded By: Bob Heile Move: Authorize responding from IEEE 802 to the FCC NPRM (Docket No. 99-231) with doc.: 11-99/210-r4 (in principal). Approved by 802.11 EMAIL ballot: 69-Yes, 2-No, 3-Abstain. This letter states that "The Committee supports the CW jammer test, together with the additional requirement for mathematical justification for systems utilizing codes with less than 10 chips as proposed in paragraph 15 and advises the Commission of our concerns regarding an alternative Gaussian noise test as proposed in paragraph 14. Members of the Committee have performed extensive analysis and technical trade-off studies that were discussed at the IEEE 802.11 Interim Meeeting (Santa Rosa, 13-17 September 1999) to ensure that its 2.4 GHz high data rate waveform adheres to the processing Gain requirement of at least 10dB.2 As a result of these studies, it has concluded that the processing Gain test using the CW jamming test as proposed in paragraph 15 of the Notice is a valid method to confirm the processing gain requirement. Approval is requested for this letter (in principal) to allow for editing by Vic Hayes, Bob Heile and Jim Carlo based on various comments (including IEEE staff) being provided. The letter needs to be submitted to the FCC by 4October. If you want to see the document 99/209 in its entirety, please go to the web at: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Documents/index.html#FCC_NPRM_99-231
92408W-Third-ex-parte-letter-99-231.pdf