RE: Response to SC6 N11216
Jim,
Is it appropriate to send an 802 statement as the Chairman of the SC6 group?
It would give the wrong weight to the letter.
I would advise that the letter would be sent by Geoff.
Vic
> ----------
> From: Jim Carlo[SMTP:jcarlo@ti.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 06:44
> To: IEEE802
> Cc: Robin Tasker
> Subject: Response to SC6 N11216
>
> <<File: 802-R11216.PDF>>
> After various feedback from Geoff Thompson,Tony Jeffree, Roy Bynum, and
> Herb
> Bertine (Chair of ITU-T, SG7), I plan to send the following attached file
> (content also in text at bottom of message) as a response to SC6 N11216,
> which is actually a request from the ITU for information on the Draft
> Recommendation on Ethernet Frame over SDH/WDM, which is TD3151/Rev.1.
>
> Jim Carlo(jcarlo@ti.com) Cellular:1-214-693-1776 Voice&Fax:1-214-853-5274
> TI Fellow, Networking Standards at Texas Instruments
> Chair, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 Telecom and Info Exchange Between Systems
> Chair, IEEE802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee
>
> ++++++++++++++=
> Subject: Response to SC06 N 11216 (Comments on draft Recommendation on
> Ethernet Frame over SDH/WDM)
>
> Reference: SC06 N 11216 Liaison Statement Request
> Q.10/7 TD 3155/Rev1 Liaison Statement Request
> Q.10/7 TD 3151/Rev1 Draft Recommendation
>
> At the IEEE 802 Plenary Meeting (8Nov99 - 12Nov99) the draft document
> TD3155/Rev.1 was considered as an item but no technical response could be
> prepared. The details that are asked for are somewhat outside the current
> experience base of 802.3 voting membership. The 802.3 Working Group is
> composed of experts in the CSMA/CD Access Method and devices (MACs) built
> up
> on that base as well as experts in building physical layers that provide
> coding and transmission interfaces between the MAC and LAN physical media
> (twisted pair and fiber).
>
> As part of the new work proposal now before the IEEE-SA Standards Board on
> 10Gigabit Ethernet, IEEE 802.3 is building up its technical expertise in
> SONET,SDH, and related wide-area transport mechanisms. I hope that we can
> be in a better position to respond to communication requests on this topic
> in the future.
> ++++++++++++++++++++
>