Re: URGENT - We Need an Instantaneous Response. (That means DO IT NOW !!!)
Bob, what if the interim arrangements are available to all dot groups but
not all of them want to take advantage of it? That is kind of what we have
here. Even more important, many of the groups will be trying this out in
May. We may or may not want to do that again. If some groups do not want
to use this service in the future, is that going to cause you to want to
withdraw your support for the whole idea?
Best regards,
Robert D. Love
President, LAN Connect Consultants
7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816
email: rdlove@ieee.org Fax: 720 222-0900
----- Original Message -----
From: Grow, Bob <bob.grow@intel.com>
To: 'Rigsbee, Everett O' <Everett.Rigsbee@PSS.Boeing.com>; 802 Exec
<stds-802-sec@ieee.org>
Cc: 802 @F2F Dawn S <dawns@facetoface-events.com>; 802 @F2F Darcel Moro
<dmoro@attcanada.ca>; Caroline R. Armstrong <carmstrong@imag.net>; Kesling,
Dawson W <dawson.w.kesling@intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 1:49 PM
Subject: RE: URGENT - We Need an Instantaneous Response. (That means DO IT
NOW !!!)
>
> I have a concern with option #2. If I understand it correctly, we are
using
> a host for ~half of 802, and the 802 treasury for the other ~half of 802.
> This is a bad precedent, and would be yet one more thing supported by the
> 802 treasury that is not for the benefit of all of 802. I can only
support
> option #1 or option #3.
>
> --Bob Grow