Re: [802SEC] +++SEC Ballot: Rules change for Wireless PARs+++
Vic,
I vote Disapprove. My comments were part of the comment attachment
that you distributed with the ballot. I would expect switch my vote
to Approve if my comments are addressed.
For clarity, I'd like to note that, in my comment, my intent was to
strike out the footnote.
Roger
>Dear SEC,
>Per the motion passed at the November 2001 meeting, attached you will find
>the proposal for the IEEE 802 Rules change to require an additional item for
>item to be addressed in PARs regarding spectrum and co-existence for e-mail
>ballot.
>In addition, you will find the collection of comments received to a call for
>comments from the .1, .3, .11, .15 and .16 reflectors.
>The ballot opened January 24, 8 AM EDT and closes February 10 5pm EDT. As
>the SEC appointed me as the driver of the rules change, I respectfully
>request that you send your vote to me.
> <<RR-02-011r0_Comments-on-SEC-PARs.doc>>
><<RR-01-029r1_Proposed_Rules_Change_for_Wireless_PARs.doc>>
>Regards,
>
>
>---------------
>Vic Hayes
>Agere Systems Nederland B.V., formerly Lucent Technologies
>Zadelstede 1-10
>3431 JZ Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
>Phone: +31 30 609 7528 (Time Zone UTC + 1)
>FAX: +31 30 609 7498
>e-mail: vichayes@agere.com
>http://www.orinocowireless.com/
>
>