RE: [802SEC] Submission of 802.17a to Revcom
Mike,
Roger is correct, an SEC motion is not needed. 802.17 should presubmit
the PAR to NesCom, I agree to this action.
Jodi Haasz and NesCom is very familiar with this process and understands
there may be minor tweaks to the PAR after the November plenary session.
Regards,
--Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Roger B.
Marks
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:34 PM
To: Mike Takefman
Cc: stds-802-sec@ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Submission of 802.17a to Revcom
Mike,
I was a little confused by your message; the title says RevCom, but you
meant NesCom.
Anyway, NesCom presubmission is like RevCom presubmission. In both
cases, you don't need a motion to do it; you just need the SEC Chair to
OK it.
Roger
At 4:27 PM -0400 02/10/10, Mike Takefman wrote:
>Dear SEC,
>
>It has been mentioned to me by Tony that I should presubmit
>802.17a to NESCOM prior to the November 1 cutoff. As
>I had not requested this at the previous SEC meeting, I
>would like to propose the following SEC motion.
>
>"Move that the SEC grants approval for forwarding P802.17a to NesCom
>with the understanding that, should it not be approved during the
>November 2002 SEC Closing Plenary it shall be removed from the
>NesCom agenda".
>
>Background information:
>The PAR is part of the obligation of the existing 802.17 PAR and
>was unanimously approved at the September meeting.
>Tony helped me write the PAR so I expect it is correct.
>The PAR is under review in Kauai, and if there are issues the
>PAR will be pulled.
>
>cheers,
>
>mike
>--
>Michael Takefman tak@cisco.com
>Manager of Engineering, Cisco Systems
>Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
>2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
>voice: 613-254-3399 fax: 613-254-4867