RE: [802SEC] Motion to authorize additional projectors
I had said projector #2 at the Nawlins interim - it cuts off the RHS of the
frame (probably out of alignment following being dropped or similar). Given
its age, my preferred solution would be to save the repair cost & just get
replacements - the current technology is vastly superior in all respects.
However, I support this motion as stated.
Regards,
Tony
At 07:56 12/10/2002 -0400, Stevenson, Carl R (Carl) wrote:
>I second the motion.
>
>Carl
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:billq@attglobal.net]
> > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 6:46 PM
> > To: IEEE 802 SEC
> > Subject: [802SEC] Motion to authorize additional projectors
> >
> >
> >
> > Members of the SEC,
> >
> > Projector #2 began behaving badly in New Orleans during the
> > 802.1/.3/.17
> > interim meetings. (Don't think it was the food or the hurricane.) We
> > are looking into whether it is economic repairable, but do not have an
> > answer yet. In addition, Buzz tells me that even with a healthy
> > projection #2 we are still really one projector short. In
> > light of the
> > cost of renting lcd projectors, renting one or two makes no sense. If
> > #2 is economically repairable,, it will be provide a ready
> > spare in case
> > one of the other units takes a dive.
> >
> > Therefore to ensure that we have enough projectors for Kauai
> > and future
> > meetings, I make the following motion.
> >
> >
> > "That the 802 SEC authorized the purchase of two new lcd
> > projectors, not
> > to exceed $2500 each plus taxes and shipping, and the repair of
> > projector #2, not to exceed $700 plus taxes and shipping."
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > wlq
> >
Regards,
Tony